RIGHT TO PLAY, INDIGENOUS PROGRAMS
Request For Proposals: Quebec Feasibility Study
_____________________________________________________________________________
Date issued: October 16, 2025
Proposal Submission Deadline: Nov 13, 2025
Questions concerning this RFP should be directed to:
RTP Indigenous Programs
Table of Contents
1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE .................................................................................................3
2. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................3
3. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................5
4. SCOPE OF WORK ...............................................................................................................7
5. ANTICIPATED TIMELINES ..................................................................................................8
6. RFP SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS …..................................................................................9
7. RFP SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................10
8. RFP SUBMISSION EVALUATION .......................................................................................11
9. CONFIDENTIALITY ............................................................................................................12
Right to Play (RTP) is seeking a qualified bilingual Proponent (English/French) to conduct a feasibility study on expanding the RTP PLAY program for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis children and youth into the province of Québec. The study will assess program demand, partnership opportunities, funding potential, and compliance with French Language Services requirements. The Proponent will deliver a bilingual report that will include strategic recommendations and 3–5-year implementation plan to guide organizational decision-making.
2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 About Right To Play
Established in 2000, Right To Play is a leading global development non-profit organization that uses play-based learning to transform the lives of children and youth impacted by poverty, war, disease, and inequality. Play is one of the most transformative forces in a child’s life. RTP believe play should be fun and enjoyable, socially interactive, actively engaging, meaningful, and imaginative. Through play-based learning children and youth learn:
Right To Play reaches millions of children and youth each year through experiential play programming in 14 countries in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Indigenous communities in Canada. These programs are supported by our headquarters in Toronto, Canada; London, UK and seven national offices across Europe and North America.
2.2 About Right To Play Indigenous Programs
In Canada, the Right To Play country office is called Indigenous Programs. Indigenous Programs currently partners with 80+ First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities and Indigenous youth serving schools, charities and non-profits across Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Yukon to deliver community-driven, culturally relevant play-based learning programs that responds national calls for:
2.3 Available Documents:
A strategic priority of the Indigenous Programs 2024-2026 Strategic Plan is the development of formal partnerships with First Nation, Inuit, and Métis communities, federations, organizations and tribal councils currently reaching children and youth to enable sustainable growth and scale, with the long-term goal of nationalizing operations. As the province of Quebec is the second largest province/territory in Canada and home to over 40 First Nations & Inuit communities, this is a high priority geographic scaling opportunity for Right To Play.
Current donors of the PLAY program, who are national corporations, have expressed interest in funding the program in this province. Right To Play has received funding from several of these donors to conduct a feasibility study for growth and scale in Quebec. The feasibility study will help Right to Play determine the practicality of expanding partnerships into Quebec by examining:
3.1 Key Questions
The feasibility study should address the following:
1. Program Needs:
a. What is the need for Right to Play’s programs in Québec?
b. What are the gaps in existing programs that Right to Play can fill?
c. Are there aspects of the PLAY program that too closely duplicate services already available in the province?
d. What are some of the skills First Nation, Inuit and Métis children and youth in communities have?
e. What are some of the skills communities would First Nation, Inuit and Métis communities like children and youth to build or enhance?
2. Partnership Opportunities:
a. Which organizations, schools, and First Nations, Inuit & Métis government agencies could be potential partners?
b. What are the best strategies for partnership engagement?
3. Funding Potential:
a. What funding sources are available for program expansion in Québec?
b. What are the eligibility requirements and application processes for key funding sources?
4. Regulatory & Language Compliance:
a. What are the key FLS requirements and how can Right to Play ensure compliance?
b. What other regulatory considerations must be addressed for program implementation?
5. Operational Feasibility:
a. What staffing, infrastructure, and logistical considerations are needed for expansion?
b. What challenges might arise, and how can they be mitigated?
3.2 Key Stakeholders
First Nation, Inuit, and Métis Stakeholders
The feasibility study will triangulate information from interviews with secondary research to formulate the summary of findings and key recommendations. The below stakeholders will be important sources of information for understanding community needs, cultural relevance, and investigating potential program delivery partners.
Prospective Donor Stakeholders
In order for Right To Play to effectively initiate programs in Quebec, with respect to the values of community-ownership and sustainability, there are three key funding components to consider: (a) having a diversity of funders of various types, (b) having multi-year donors that can provide foundational funding, and (c) engaging community-level program partners in order to collaboratively solicit specific donors.
4. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work is broken down into four phases with the final phase resulting in a final report and 3-5 year proposal for scaling into Quebec. The following is a preliminary scope of work that may be modified during contract negotiations with the selected Proponent. This preliminary scope of work is intended to outline and describe the range of anticipated tasks but is not intended to be complete or final.
Phase 1: Translation (1 month)
Phase 2: Research & Environmental Scan (2 months)
Phase 3: Qualitative Field Research (2 months)
Phase 4: Reporting & Recommendations (1 month)
The following is the RFP and project timeline. Right To Play reserves the right to modify the RFP timeline dates and times. Project start and end dates may be modified because of Proponent proposals and contract negotiations. All dates/time are EST.
6.1 Proposal Submission
Contact: RTP Indigenous Programs
Email: PLAY
Subject Line: “Proposal - Indigenous Programs, Quebec Feasibility Study”
6.2 Questions and Clarifications
Contact: RTP Indigenous Programs
Email: PLAY
Subject Line: “Attention: Expression of Interest Question - Indigenous Programs, Quebec Feasibility Study”
6.3 Addenda
To maintain uniformity with all proposals furnished by Proponents, the proposals shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) pages, excluding front and back covers, section dividers, references, and resumes.
Interested applicants should submit a proposal that includes the following:
A. Title Page
This first page should who the project title and RFP name. Included on this page should be the Proponent’s contact information as follows:
B. Firm Background & Experience
C. Project Approach & Methodology
D. Proposed Timeline & Workplan
E. Budget & Fee Structure
F. Appendix with Resumes & References
Proponents may provide additional information beyond that requested in the RFP for RTP’s consideration. Any such additional information may be considered by RTP at its sole discretion.
Proponents will be judged based on the evaluation rubric below.
Experience & qualifications of the Proponent (Performance & Reliability) 30%
Relevance & feasibility of the proposed methodology (Required Specifications) 30%
Realistic and detailed work plan and timeline (Availability & Delivery) 20%
Cost-effectiveness and budget justification (Value for Money) 20%
RTP’s evaluation of any Proposal does not obligate RTP to accept it or any Proposal or to proceed further with this RFP. RTP may, in its sole direction, and for any or no reason, elect not to proceed with this RFP, elect not to accept any or all Proposals, and/or cancel this RFP. RTP is under no obligation to enter a Contract where only one Proposal is received before the Submission Deadline, whether or not such Proposal has been opened or evaluated.
In addition to any other express rights of RTP or any other rights which may be implied in the circumstances, RTP reserves the right to:
(i) accept a Proposal and award the Contract without negotiations;
(ii) verify with a third party any information contained in a Proposal;
(iii) adjust a Proponent’s evaluation or reject a Proponent’s Proposal on the basis of: (A) information provided by references; (B) information provided by a Proponent where RTP has exercised its right to request clarification or supplementary information; (C) misrepresentations or any other inaccurate or misleading information;
(iv) request a shortlist of Proponents to participate in an interview with RTP;
(v) discuss with any Proponent and/or negotiate with any Proponent different or additional terms to those contemplated in this RFP;
(v) accept the whole or any part of a Proposal or a combination of parts of a Proposal;
(vi) cancel this RFP at any stage and issue a new RFP for the same or similar services;
(vii) keep evaluation details and/or Proponent rankings confidential.
9. CONFIDENTIALITY
All information provided by or obtained from RTP in connection with this RFP, either before or after the issuance of the RFP, is the sole property of RTP and must be treated as confidential. Such information is not to be used for any purpose other than replying to this RFP.
By submitting a Proposal, Proponents acknowledge that the contents of their Proposals will be disclosed, on a confidential basis, to the evaluation committee for the purpose of evaluating or participating in the evaluation of Proposals.
Please Note: WorkInNonProfits.ca is not affiliated with and in no way endorses or vets the organization that posted this job. Any links posted within the job will take you to their external site where the same disclaimer applies.
Thanks for looking on WorkInNonProfits.ca and good luck with your job search!